#158208: "2nd and 3rd place etc. scoring aren't reflective of who was 2nd best"
О чём этот отчёт?
Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего
Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего
Пожалуйста, проверьте, существует ли уже отчёт на ту же тему
Если это так, ПРОГОЛОСУЙТЕ за этот отчёт. Отчёты с наибольшим количеством голосов будут рассматриваться В ПЕРВУЮ ОЧЕРЕДЬ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Подробное описание
-
• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст ошибки, которую вы видите на экране (если она есть).
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Пожалуйста, объясните, что вы хотели сделать, что вы сделали и что случилось
• Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Что было изображено на экране, когда вас заблокировало? (Пустой экран? Часть игрового стола? Сообщение об ошибке?)
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Какая часть правил не соблюдена в версии БГА
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Видно ли нарушение правил в повторе игры? Если да, то на каком ходу?
• Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Какое игровое действие вы хотели совершить?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Что вы пытались сделать, чтобы выполнить это игровое действие?
-
• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали сделать это (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?
• Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• На каком шаге игры произошла проблема (какой была текущая игровая инструкция)?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали совершить игровое действие (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?
• Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Пожалуйста, опишите ошибку отображения. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
-
• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Какой браузер вы используете?
Mozilla v5
История отчёта
A more complicated and probably divisive solution would be to add some additional points at the end to rank 2nd-3rd-4th by total goods + money or something, but that seems complicated and might be impossible to do well? But it's another idea.
Добавить что-нибудь к этому отчёту
- Другой номер игрового стола / номер хода
- Помогло ли решить проблему нажатие F5?
- Случилась ли проблема несколько раз? Постоянно? От случая к случаю?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
