Все отчёты
#19843: "Either disable "conceed" option OR allow to end the game after conceeding"
О чём этот отчёт?
Сайт БГА
Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего
Предложение: я считаю, что сайт можно значительно улучшить следующим образом
Подробное описание
• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
As a Seasons player, I find VERY frustrating when an opponent conceed the game near the end. When we work hard on a draft and cannot play it, it removes all the fun of the game. To me, it's actually highly unfair-play to do that.
To fix this frustration, I see 2 options:
- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game• Какой браузер вы используете?
Not relevant
История отчёта
26 июн 2020 16:35 • compte obelète • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
30 июн 2020 13:52 • Niluje • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
My last 40 Seasons game: 7 conceed: 86%, 60%, 97%, 86%, 77%, 100%, 97%
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
2 дек 2020 18:55 • Wicksweff • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
When you agree to a game, you should be agreeing to play it to completion.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
3 дек 2020 1:16 • jda • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
I agree the current system is frustrating. Changing it to offer to concede would be good.
22 мар 2021 12:06 • Maeves • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
i agree, you are thinking of your next move, and without notice, the game end because of conceed.
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
24 мар 2021 19:14 • KongKing123 • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
No thanks. Forcing someone to play out a lost game just for your enjoyment is not the way to go.
27 ноя 2022 13:46 • Wicksweff • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
If you agree to the game, you play to the end.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
27 ноя 2022 15:58 • ufm • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
Qutting is equivalent to flipping the board. Not conceding.
27 ноя 2022 16:05 • ufm • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
Conceding literally means 'admitting their defeat', not flipping the board or ragequitting. The game has ended.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
20 дек 2023 2:05 • Cos- • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
I strongly favor the last option: Allow remaining player to finish the game if someone concedes.
3 фев 2024 9:29 • pecan • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
For me, we have option to resign is the biggest advantage of 2-player game.
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
Добавить что-нибудь к этому отчёту
Пожалуйста, укажите всё, что вам кажется значительным для воспроизведения этой ошибки или понимания вашего предложения:
- Другой номер игрового стола / номер хода
- Помогло ли решить проблему нажатие F5?
- Случилась ли проблема несколько раз? Постоянно? От случая к случаю?
- Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.
