• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст ошибки, которую вы видите на экране (если она есть).

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Пожалуйста, объясните, что вы хотели сделать, что вы сделали и что случилось

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Что было изображено на экране, когда вас заблокировало? (Пустой экран? Часть игрового стола? Сообщение об ошибке?)

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Какая часть правил не соблюдена в версии БГА

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Видно ли нарушение правил в повторе игры? Если да, то на каком ходу?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Какое игровое действие вы хотели совершить?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Что вы пытались сделать, чтобы выполнить это игровое действие?

• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали сделать это (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• На каком шаге игры произошла проблема (какой была текущая игровая инструкция)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали совершить игровое действие (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, опишите ошибку отображения. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Какой браузер вы используете?