Все отчёты
Отчёты Космобаза
#63467: "Random Number generator"
rejected: Разработчики не думают, что это хорошая идея, или соотношение затрат к пользе слишком высоко
6
О чём этот отчёт?
Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего
Предложение: по моему мнению, это действительно улучшит реализацию игры
Подробное описание
• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
The random number generator for this game does not seem to work properly. If you roll 2d6 (two normal dice), the probabilities for each number are weighted most toward the middle numbers, six(13.89%), seven (16.67%), and eight (13.89%). This means that 44.45% of the time, the dice should equal one of those three numbers. After more than 80 plays of this game, I can tell you that there is no way those percentages are holding up. What appears to be happening is an even chance (9.09%) of rolling each number from 2 through 12, rather than the proper spread we should be seeing. The end result is an overwhelming amount of rolls away from what should be the most commonly rolled numbers.• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Google Chrome v100
История отчёта
25 апр 2022 4:10 • Talon378 • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
This is occurring in every game I play of this game. The lack of compliance to what should be the proper probabilities for the spread of rolls means that the strategy of the game is altered and becomes MUCH more random.
6 мая 2022 7:05 • Rick_M • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
I also sense that the dice rolls are not random. We just played 4 games and (1)(2) roll was much too frequent. I remember the first time I played and rolled 4 elevens in a row to start the game. I'd run some stats on the dice, but capturing the data from a game would be much too tedious.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
9 мая 2022 2:01 • Talon378 • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
Table #265890439
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
21 июн 2022 20:06 • Biking Gamer • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
I concur - the dice rolls on this game (and others) does not appear random. I recommend using the milliseconds on clock time as a seed for your random number generator -- that should produce more random results.
10 фев 2023 16:29 • Andrew C-137 • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
@ Rick_M
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
12 фев 2023 16:18 • Shazzypaz • Разработчики не думают, что это хорошая идея, или соотношение затрат к пользе слишком высоко:
Developers are instructed to use the bga_rand() function, no flexibility to use another function. If you are concerned about the randomness, please upvote boardgamearena.com/bug?id=72077.
7 апр 2023 1:40 • Antstad • Разработчики не думают, что это хорошая идея, или соотношение затрат к пользе слишком высоко:
Just upvoted. I sware it's getting worse on the site.
Добавить что-нибудь к этому отчёту
Пожалуйста, укажите всё, что вам кажется значительным для воспроизведения этой ошибки или понимания вашего предложения:
- Другой номер игрового стола / номер хода
- Помогло ли решить проблему нажатие F5?
- Случилась ли проблема несколько раз? Постоянно? От случая к случаю?
- Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.
