• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст ошибки, которую вы видите на экране (если она есть).

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Пожалуйста, объясните, что вы хотели сделать, что вы сделали и что случилось

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Что было изображено на экране, когда вас заблокировало? (Пустой экран? Часть игрового стола? Сообщение об ошибке?)

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Какая часть правил не соблюдена в версии BGA?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Видно ли нарушение правил в повторе игры? Если да, то на каком ходу?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Какое игровое действие вы хотели совершить?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Что вы пытались сделать, чтобы выполнить это игровое действие?

• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали сделать это (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• На каком шаге игры произошла проблема (какой была текущая игровая инструкция)?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали совершить игровое действие (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, опишите ошибку отображения. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть скриншот этой ошибки (что является хорошей практикой), вы можете использовать любой сервис для размещения изображений (например, snipboard.io), чтобы загрузить его и скопировать/вставить ссылку сюда. Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Какой браузер вы используете?