Все отчёты
Отчёты Квант
#31870: "- Insert the possibility for a Player to leave the game, letting the game continue for the others."
rejected: Разработчики не думают, что это хорошая идея, или соотношение затрат к пользе слишком высоко
6
О чём этот отчёт?
Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего
Предложение: по моему мнению, это действительно улучшит реализацию игры
Подробное описание
• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
In 3 or 4 players the game can take a long time and therefore some players clearly at a disadvantage would like to be able to leave the game.
You could therefore insert a button that allows the player to leave (only him) the game, exactly as happens for example in Through the Ages, where at the beginning of the political phase the game asks if you want to leave.
This way other players can continue playing and finishing the game without any problems.• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Opera
История отчёта
14 янв 2021 13:53 •
Jekka • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
12 авг 2021 10:31 • Through the Ages was designed with that option, that's why it's implemented
Qunatum don't have that option it the rules, that's why you can't leave mid game (unless you quit, which hurt your karma.)
Qunatum don't have that option it the rules, that's why you can't leave mid game (unless you quit, which hurt your karma.)
ALA_IN • Разработчики ещё не проанализировали это предложение:
23 ноя 2022 13:46 • You're right Jekka, but couldn't you enter this option as a "bga option" ? :(
CraWleR • Разработчики не думают, что это хорошая идея, или соотношение затрат к пользе слишком высоко:
29 апр 2023 12:05 • Rejecting this due to multiple points:
* As Jekka mentioned, there's no official rule for it. "BGA option" could be a possibility, but once again - I doubt we could find agreement on when and how this should and shouldn't be allowed
* I'm not familiar with Through the Ages rules, but I assume implementing such a feature would be a pain especially since there are no rules about it
* When you end up in a situation where you would want this, I'd recommend looking at it from a different angle. In Quantum, especially in 3 or 4 player games, it may seem like you have no chance of winning, but you can still win unless the game is a couple of turns away from ending. The fact that the game encourages teaming up against the winning player hugely contributes to that. If you find yourself in a situation where you think you have no change of winning and the game is not a couple of turns away, then focus on making yourself stronger - research more to get better command cards, build cubes instead of attacking the winning player, etc. - and leave the other player(s) to delay or stop the player that seems to be winning.
I've personally had at least a couple of 3 player games where I've ended up playing against seemingly 2 friends that had agreed before the game that 1 of them would win, but not me. From turn 1, they would both attack me, keep destroying my ships and attempt to prevent me from expanding. I remember that I've won at least 1 of such games. So in Quantum you can still win, even if the players intentionally try to make you lose. Just think creatively.
* As Jekka mentioned, there's no official rule for it. "BGA option" could be a possibility, but once again - I doubt we could find agreement on when and how this should and shouldn't be allowed
* I'm not familiar with Through the Ages rules, but I assume implementing such a feature would be a pain especially since there are no rules about it
* When you end up in a situation where you would want this, I'd recommend looking at it from a different angle. In Quantum, especially in 3 or 4 player games, it may seem like you have no chance of winning, but you can still win unless the game is a couple of turns away from ending. The fact that the game encourages teaming up against the winning player hugely contributes to that. If you find yourself in a situation where you think you have no change of winning and the game is not a couple of turns away, then focus on making yourself stronger - research more to get better command cards, build cubes instead of attacking the winning player, etc. - and leave the other player(s) to delay or stop the player that seems to be winning.
I've personally had at least a couple of 3 player games where I've ended up playing against seemingly 2 friends that had agreed before the game that 1 of them would win, but not me. From turn 1, they would both attack me, keep destroying my ships and attempt to prevent me from expanding. I remember that I've won at least 1 of such games. So in Quantum you can still win, even if the players intentionally try to make you lose. Just think creatively.
Добавить что-нибудь к этому отчёту
Пожалуйста, укажите всё, что вам кажется значительным для воспроизведения этой ошибки или понимания вашего предложения:
- Другой номер игрового стола / номер хода
- Помогло ли решить проблему нажатие F5?
- Случилась ли проблема несколько раз? Постоянно? От случая к случаю?
- Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.