#94314: ""One or Two Dutch" and "Extra Roles" Variant Setups"

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте текст ошибки, которую вы видите на экране (если она есть).
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Пожалуйста, объясните, что вы хотели сделать, что вы сделали и что случилось
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Что было изображено на экране, когда вас заблокировало? (Пустой экран? Часть игрового стола? Сообщение об ошибке?)
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Какая часть правил не соблюдена в версии БГА
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Видно ли нарушение правил в повторе игры? Если да, то на каком ходу?
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Какое игровое действие вы хотели совершить?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Что вы пытались сделать, чтобы выполнить это игровое действие?
• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали сделать это (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• На каком шаге игры произошла проблема (какой была текущая игровая инструкция)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Что произошло, когда вы попробовали совершить игровое действие (сообщение об ошибке, сообщение в строке состояния игры...)?
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Пожалуйста, опишите ошибку отображения. Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Пожалуйста, скопируйте/вставьте текст, который отображается на английском языке, вместо вашего. Если у вас есть снимок экрана с этой ошибкой (хорошая привычка), вы можете воспользоваться Imgur.com, чтобы загрузить его и вставить сюда ссылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Доступен ли этот текст в системе перевода? Если да, был ли он переведён более 24 часов назад?
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

• Пожалуйста, точно и кратко опишите своё предложение, чтобы сделать его наиболее доступным для понимания.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Какой обозреватель вы используете?
Mozilla v5

О чём этот отчёт?

Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего

Что произошло? Пожалуйста, выберите из нижеследующего

Пожалуйста, проверьте, существует ли уже отчёт на ту же тему

Подробное описание

История отчёта

Добавить что-нибудь к этому отчёту

Изменить статус отчёта на:

Помощь

Сотрудничество

Следуйте за нами